Seyyid Abdülhakîm-i Arvâsî û @goygoytarihh الذي كان كسر الذرة ، الذي غير هذه الأبجدية lan tam atomu parçalıyordum kim değişti bu alfabeyi 13:14 - 29 Sub 20 saatinde online casino & sports betting
Kaynak
The photo is a tweet. The tweet is written in Turkish and Arabic, with a picture of a person. The tweet's content talks about how someone (Seyyid Abdülhakîm-i Arvâsî) changed the alphabet. The joke is a play on words, using a historical figure (likely a scholar or religious figure) and making a lighthearted comparison to the discovery of atomic structure in science. The tweet says, in essence: "Seyyid Abdülhakîm-i Arvâsî, who split the atom, who changed this alphabet." The humorous part is the implication that this historical figure (Seyyid Abdülhakîm-i Arvâsî) somehow changed the alphabet. It's an absurd idea because while he may have influenced language and culture, he clearly didn't alter the alphabet the way scientific discoveries change our understanding of matter. The implied comparison is between this *historically important person* who *changed things* and *scientific progress*, using the example of a key scientific discovery. It's a humorous juxtaposition. The use of the phrase "lan tam atomu parçalıyordum kim değiştirdi bu alfabeyi" (who changed this alphabet, when I was splitting the whole atom) adds to the humorous absurdity. The speaker is implying they are changing the alphabet, a monumental task, and this is in response to the splitting of an atom, an equally monumental task in a different field. The tweet is implying the person being referenced here didn't directly affect the scientific discovery, and is merely making a lighthearted comparison in a comical way.
Henüz bişi yazılmamış