Berk Çakır @BerkCakr_ 942m 1938 Yılına dönsek, saat 9 olsa, ama hiç 5 geçmese. #10kasım 23 11 şuna yanıt olarak: @BerkCakr_ Dante @Dantekaraeski 19 Atam ölüm döşeğinde kıvransın mı yani vatan haini şerefsiz piç @BerkCakr 01:12 - 10 Kas 14 savoybetting
Kaynak
The image shows a series of social media posts, likely from Twitter or a similar platform. **Visual Description:** It features two user profiles, one named "Berk Çakır" and another named "Dante", along with a picture of each user. The posts contain text in Turkish. The overall theme of the content is a humorous and inflammatory discussion. **The Joke (in Turkish):** The core of the joke plays on a hypothetical situation and a very strong emotional response. Berk Çakır's post suggests a hypothetical scenario returning to 1938, implying that, if it were possible, he would not want to go back because of the current political climate. The "1938 Yılına dönsek" is a starting point for the humor. Dante's reply is a strong, insulting response directly attacking the concept and sentiment of the hypothetical. He suggests that someone who would want to return to that time would be a "şerefsiz piç" (disgraced scoundrel/lowlife), equating a desire to revisit 1938 with being a traitor (vatan haini) to one's country. The sarcasm and humor lie in the exaggerated reaction. Dante's response is extremely aggressive given the theoretical premise and thus the joke lies in the disproportionate level of insult versus the hypothetical situation. In short, the joke is based on the strong, indignant, and insulting reaction to a very subjective and hypothetic scenario. It relies on the audience recognizing the absurd nature of the exchange and the exaggeration of the insult.
Bu tarih bilgisiyle Atatürk'ün ölüm yılını bile hatırlayamadığın belli 😂