Videoda söylenenler

I love cold showers. How did the mirror fog up if you took a cold shower? She said that she loves cold showers, not that she had a cold shower. If she had a cold shower, she would have said so. Even if she does enjoy cold showers, would it not be contradictory for me to say I love mustard and to show a picture of a bottle of ketchup? That is an unrelated hypothetical to the dilemma at hand. To engage with such would be to engage with a fallacy. You can't object on the grounds of relevancy here. The principle of both situations is the same. You should still start in the situation to prove that it's deceptive. Are you claiming my client's a liar? I'm simply saying one can see and consider A that she is not above attaching deceptive imagery to her statements. Let the record reflect that you brought up the word liar. My client has already stated that she had bathed in hot water and then in cold water. You failed to consider that both could be the case, yet didn't hesitate to say she's above deceptive imagery, looking wildly unprofessional there. At no point did she imply that she bathed in hot water. Her statement only implies that her water transitioned from hot to cold. I must say, no shower control system I've ever encountered starts on hot and moves to cold. You failed to consider the possibility that she took a hot shower, disliked it, and then took a cold shower to make up for it. Thus, only enjoying the cold shower. If she knows that she loves cold showers, why on earth would she start with a hot shower? There's no way she'd wait the time required for the water to heat up if she knew she disliked hot showers. Where's it stated that she knew she disliked hot showers? Not only is that information trivial, it's also ignoring the possibility that she wanted to try out a hot shower to see if she still disliked hot showers. It was hot then cold. Wouldn't the cold water have gone by the mirror? That's not how it works. Yes it is. The cold water unevaporated. The water in the core. That is enough. The prosecution has a point. But neither side has enough evidence to support their claims. This trial should be postponed until sufficient evidence has been gathered. Adjourned!